Thank you to my friend Jim for sharing the youtube video of the Republican debate last night. I’m afraid I was not able to stomach watching the entire thing last night. Talk abut a group of people that can really make me feel ashamed of being an American. What rock did these people crawl out from under? I feel horrible for all the foster children Bachmann had influence over. As a gay man, I found it disgusting and horribly bigoted that not one of the Republican candidates is for marriage equality or will support the repeal of DADT. They are supposed to protect the citizens of the country, not discriminate against us! If you are a gay Republican, shame on you! Click here to see the video.
Let Bigotry Reign Supreme: New Republican Motto
14 Jun- Comments 6 Comments
- Categories Civil Rights, Feminism, Government, History, LGBTQ, Media, Politics
- Author Michael Hulshof-Schmidt
6 Responses to “Let Bigotry Reign Supreme: New Republican Motto”
Leave a comment Cancel reply
Hot Topics on Social Justice For All
1% Abortion activism activist Affordable Care Act anti-choice anti-gay Bigot of the Week bigotry birth control Black History Black History Month bullying Class War DADT discrimination DOMA education equality equity Gay History Month Gay Marriage Gay Rights GOP Gun Control hate Health care Hero of the Week Hero of the Week Award HIV homophobia hypocrisy integrity intersections of oppression Islamophobia John Boehner John McCain Journalism LGBT History LGBT History Month Lies Marriage Equality Michele Bachmann misogyny Mitt Romney Movies music NAACP NOM Oppression Oregon Planned Parenthood Poverty President Obama pro-choice quote of the day Racism religion Republicans Sarah Palin Scott Walker Sexism social work Suffragist Supreme Court Tea Party transgender Transphobia War on women Wisconsin Women's history Women's History Month women's rights Word of the Week Worker's RightsCategories
- Civil Rights (957)
- Feminism (1,270)
- Government (1,729)
- History (1,845)
- Humor (146)
- Interviews (72)
- LGBTQ (1,475)
- Libraries (467)
- Media (1,755)
- Politics (1,345)
- Social Justice (636)
- Uncategorized (15)
Search
Join 939 other subscribers
Blog Tools
Contact Michael
Copyright Notice
Social Justice For All and its contents are © Michael Hulshof-Schmidt, all rights reserved.
Archives
- February 2021
- October 2020
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
This week, a bill could pass that would alter Internet freedom forever. The 10 Strikes Bill, put forth by Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MI), classifies streaming copyright infringing music or movies over the Internet a felony, and after 10 strikes, you could face jail time. Sign our petition to stop this madness: http://bit.ly/ikg2ZZ
Techdirt asserts that you could face five years in jail for simply embedding a youtube video, and that the laws apply to children who put videos of themselves lip syncing to popular songs on youtube.
Once again, the government shows a fundamental lack of understanding of the Internet and Internet freedom. Instead of writing a set of laws that would be quickly evaded, we should be working towards a new set of standards to protect Intellectual Property while accommodating the freedom of information the Internet provides. The force behind the bill, the Motion Picture Association of America, acts solely in Hollywood’s interest.
Protect your own interests and sign our petition to keep the Internet free!
http://bit.ly/ikg2ZZ
So, even though I don’t support a single one of those fools, shame on me? What the hell Michael, I can’t imagine you being a fellow who uses, much less favors, blanket statements. Bitch about their supporters sure, but don’t blame all of us because we don’t have any candidates worth a damn.
Podunk, I am most certainly blasting the people that are being chosen to lead the Republican party, for which I offer no apology. I am more than happy and would be thrilled to celebrate a Republican candidate that did not participate in discriminating against the LGBT community and against women. If you have someone for me to acknowledge, please do let me know.
I’m not bitching about your bitching about the candidates. You’re more than welcome to blast the current runners all you want. I was more annoyed with the “If you are a gay Republican, shame on you!” at the end of your post. I’m not ashamed to be a republican Michael, they may have some policies I don’t believe in but they’re more inline with my opinions than the dems. I don’t really have any candidate to throw at you. Allen West would be my pick but he is neither in the running nor wants to be.
Podunk, help enlighten me as to how the Republicans are more in alignment with your views. Currently, the Republican platform is categorically against reproductive rights for women, is pushing to continue DADT, and is pushing to defend DOMA.
Well, apparently I have just dug a gigantic hole for myself. I suppose I will just reply to the three issues you have pointed out. I am in favor of access to birth control not access to abortion unless in the instance of rape, incest or threat to health. I honestly have no opinion in regards to DADT. A cop out I know but better to admit the truth than to just mindlessly defend the party line. And as for DOMA, I could care less. Not because I am a republican but because even if DOMA was repealed I could still not get married.
I suppose I should clarify that I’m more of a traditional conservative but I’ll claim republican any day over democrat. Not sure that matters though.